Hong Kong court overturns media tycoon Jimmy Lai's fraud conviction

Hong Kong court overturns media tycoon Jimmy Lai's fraud conviction Hong Kong court overturns media tycoon Jimmy Lai's fraud conviction

HONG KONG — A Hong Kong court on Thursday overturned pro-democracy media tycoon Jimmy Lai’s fraud conviction and prison sentence in a surprise decision that comes soon after Lai was jailed for 20 years on a separate charge.Judges Jeremy Poon, Anthea Pang, and Derek Pang said in the judgement that they allowed the appeal from Lai, and another defendant in the case, to proceed, as a lower court judge had “erred”.”The Court of Appeal gave them leave to appeal against their conviction, allowed their appeals, quashed the convictions and set aside the sentences,” the judges wrote in a press summary of their judgement.But the 78-year-old will remain in prison. Earlier this month, he was sentenced to 20 years in jail for colluding with foreign forces under the city’s national security law.Lai, a British citizen, is a fierce critic of Beijing and is one of the biggest figures in Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement. He has been detained since 2020.That case has drawn global criticism from rights groups and countries including the US and Britain and served as one of the most high-profile events in a years-long crackdown under a national security law imposed by Beijing after mass pro-democracy protests in 2019.Lai was sentenced in December 2022 to five years and nine months in jail after being found guilty of breaching the lease terms of Apple Daily’s headquarters by concealing the operation of a private company, Dico Consultants Ltd, in the building.Another Next Digital executive, Wong Wai-keung, 61, was found guilty of fraud and jailed for 21 months.”In conclusion, we hold that Apple Daily Printing did not owe a duty to the Corporation to disclose its breach of the user restrictions or the non-alienation clauses occasioned by Dico’s occupation and use of the said Premises. With respect, the Judge erred,” the judgement read.”His reasoning in concluding that the applicants were liable for the concealment as the prosecution contended is unsupportable. He erred in making those findings.”In the earlier ruling, Judge Stanley Chan wrote that Lai was aware of the need to apply for a license from the Hong Kong Industrial Estates Corporation for Dico to operate at the headquarters and had “acted under the protective umbrella of a media organization”.During the appeal hearing, Lai’s lawyer Derek Chan said that Dico, a company owned by Lai, supported the publishing and printing of the newspapers apart from handling the tycoon’s private affairs.Thursday’s legal victory was a rare one for the prominent China critic who has faced multiple prosecutions in recent years, and described himself in court as a “political prisoner”.His son Sebastien said, however, the ruling did not change anything for his 78-year-old father.”He still has a sentence of 20 years in prison and has spent the last half a decade in solitary confinement in maximum security. The right thing is to release him immediately before it is too late,” Sebastien Lai told Reuters.Also on Thursday, a court sentenced the father of a wanted pro-democracy activist to eight months in prison under a homegrown national security law after he attempted to terminate her insurance policy and withdraw funds. — Agencies

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep Up to Date with our Weekly Newsletter

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Advertisement